Abhidharmakoša and Analysis of Existence
Vasubandhu in his treatise Abhidharmakośa
defines that Abhidharma is a pure knowledge together with accompanying dharmas
.
A Pure Knowledge
is knowledge firstly about the highest dharma, i.e. Nirvāṇa,
secondly about dharmas with a meaning elements
or manifestations of elements
to which is divided all empirical existence, all the existence we can experience or think of.
The accompanying dharmas
are called those psychic and other elements that are inseparably connected with the goal of our contemplation:
Thus, Abhidharma stands for the sum of elements in which that part of the individual life is expressed where he moves towards the essence of the things or those elements in which the tendency to the cessation of the empirical existence manifests itself. Those elements are the tools by which the salvation is attained.
You can say that in the deeper meaning, Abhidharma is a common name for the group of metaphysical elements that leads us to the dharma-Nirvāṇa or dharmas-substrates.
In the popular sense Abhidharma means a notion
or understanding
that leads towards contemplation about Nirvāṇa or carriers (vessels).
The knowledge will be not pure
if it will be empirically mixed with elements of anxiety,
i.e. those elements that constitute a personality and are uphold by the cycle of empirical existence, but which are still tied with elements that lead towards a pure
understanding or realizing of the essence of things.
Finally, Abhidharma is also a teaching and research that is telling about the pure knowledge
, i.e. treatises that are able to create a pure knowledge
in a person:
This is the meaning why the 3rd basket of the Tripiṭaka is called Abhidharma
- as a literature or a treatise about Nirvāṇa and the elements accompanying it.
So the content of the Abhidharmic literature is the content of existence; the elements of existence, the laws which holds them together, etc.
And the goal of being is Nirvāṇa, the element of cessation.
We can say that the 1st basket of the Pāḷi Canon contains the doctrine of experience, the 2nd – the doctrine of salvation:
Both parts are connected very tight and together are creating one system, the dharma theory, to which is reduced the Buddhist teaching.
Abhidharmic literature encompasses the ontology and metaphysics which is grounded on the psychological analysis of the knowledge.
The studies of the Abhidharmic literature and the theory of the dharmas usually begin with research of the Abhidharmakośa
by Vasubandhu, which serves as an authority for all contemporary studies.
Buddhist scholars explain the theory about dharmas in a very carefully defined terminology, which gives an opportunity to describe very precisely the observations of the phenomena of the knowledge and experience.
Significant roles in the Buddhist philosophy are playing numerical expressions that serve as a tool to shorten the description as much as possible:
Statements like 5 groups
, 12 bases
, 18 elements
and many others are well known and widely accepted expressions in the Buddhist literature. They completely replace the repeating of all elements included in each classification.
In all 3 types of dharma classification the analysed object is the same – the flow of an individual life (or santāna
), elements of which, according to the tradition, Buddha himself has classified in 3 ways:
- 5 Groups (
skandha
) - 12 Bases (
āyatana
) - 18 Elements (
dhātu
)
The systematic philosophy in India started on with analysis and observations of the personality:
To explain it, first of all the human personality was analysed instead of external phenomena. But because the human psyche seems to be connected with material body, it is analysed as well. This way the human material body and its psychic content were divided to the smallest particles, elements.
In another, psychological analysis of the Buddhist scholars, the personality is seen as consisting from a consciousness altogether with the experience of its psychic content and the experience of the external phenomena in the mind, when the so called objective world becomes a part of the personality.
In Buddhist discourses on dharma theory you can mostly find the second approach.
But the analysis of the conscious personality, analysis of the consciousness and its content, nowadays is considered an object of psychology:
For this reason we could say the starting point of the dharma theory is a psychological research of a human personality.